ChatGPT科研写作与论文辅助提示词合集（SCI / 论文写作 / 审稿回复）

1. 学术中英互译

表格版： I want you to act as a scientific English-Chinese translator, I will provide you with some paragraphs in one language and your task is to accurately and academically translate the paragraphs only into the other language. Do not repeat the original provided paragraphs after translation. You should use artificial intelligence tools, such as natural language processing, and

rhetorical knowledge and experience about effective writing techniques to reply. I’ll give you my paragraphs as follows, tell me what language it is written in, and then translate. I want you to give your output in a markdown table where the first column is the original language and the second is the sentence after translating, and give each row only one sentence. Finally, all translated content is output:

**⽆表格：**I want you to act as a scientific English-Chinese translator, I will provide you with some paragraphs in one language and your task is to accurately and academically translate the paragraphs only into the other language. Do not repeat the original provided paragraphs after translation. You should use artificial intelligence tools, such as natural language processing, and

rhetorical knowledge and experience about effective writing techniques to reply. I’ll give you my paragraphs as follows:

2. 润⾊英⽂(强烈推荐-本人用此段内容润⾊成功发表1区10分以上论⽂)

表格版: I want you to act as an expert in scientific writing, I will provide you with some paragraphs in English and your task is to improve the spelling, grammar, clarity, conciseness and overall readability of the text provided, while breaking down long sentences, reducing repetition, and providing improvement suggestions. You should use artificial intelligence tools, such as natural language processing, and rhetorical knowledge and your expertise in effective scientific writing techniques to reply. Provide the output as a markdown table with the head in Chinese. The first column is the original sentence, and the second column is the sentence after editing and the third column provides explanation in Chinese. Finaliy,provide the entire edited paragraph.Please edit the following text in a scientific tone:

⽆ 表 格 版 : I want you to act as an expert in scientific writing, I will provide you with some paragraphs in English and your task is to improve the spelling, grammar, clarity, conciseness and overall readability of the text provided, while breaking down long sentences, reducing repetition, and providing improvement suggestions. You should use artificial intelligence tools, such as natural language processing, and rhetorical knowledge and your expertise in effective scientific writing techniques to reply. Provide only text after improvement. Please improve the following text in a scientific tone: (注：这段指令不可以⽤于润⾊结果； 结果部分请⽤后⾯的改写降重指令润⾊)

3. 润⾊中⽂

**表格版：**As a Chinese academic paper writing improvement assistant, your task is to improve the spelling, grammar, clarity, conciseness and overall readability of the text provided, while breaking down long sentences, reducing repetition, and providing improvement suggestions. The first column is the original sentence, and the second column is the sentence after editing and the third column provides explanation in Chinese. Please edit the following text:

**⽆表格：**As a Chinese academic paper writing improvement assistant, your task is to improve the spelling, grammar, clarity, conciseness and overall readability of the text provided, while breaking down long sentences, reducing repetition, and providing improvement suggestions. Please provide only the corrected version of the text, with explanations. Please edit the following text:

4. 改写降重

I want you to act as an expert in scientific writing, I will provide you with some paragraphs in English or Chinese and your task is to rewrite the paragraph in the original language. You should use artificial intelligence tools, such as natural language processing, and rhetorical knowledge and your expertise in effective scientific writing techniques to reply. Please only provide the text after rewriting without any explanation. Please rewrite the following text in a scientifictone:

5. 检查修改语法拼写

表格版: Can you help me ensure that the grammar and spelling are correct? Do not try to improve the text, if no mistake is found, tell me that this paragraph is good. If you find grammar or spelling mistakes, please list the mistakes you find in a three-column markdown table, with each sentence per row, put the original text in the first column, put the corrected text in the second column, and highlight the key words you fixed in the third column: (11 ⽉ 20 更新)

⽆表格: Can you help me ensure that the grammar and spelling are correct? Do not try to improve the text, if no mistake is found, tell me that this paragraph is good. Please only provide me the text after correction. The text is as following:

6. 润⾊段落间逻辑结构

Please analyze the logic and coherence among paragraphs in the following text. Identify any areas where the flow or connections between paragraphs could be improved and provide specific suggestions to enhance the overall quality and readability of the content based on the original text. Try to improve the content with keeping all original text. Provide the explanations in Chinese with bullet points for the improvement and give the text after improvement in its original language:

7. 润⾊段落内句⼦间逻辑结构

Please analyze the logic and coherence among sentences within each paragraph in the following text. Identify any areas where the flow or connections between sentences could be improved, and provide specific suggestions to enhance the overall quality and readability to the content. Please only provide the text after improving and then give a list of the improvements in Chinese. Please improve the following text: (这段指令⾮常好⽤，适⽤于各种场景尤其是润⾊⾃⼰写的⽂章)

8. 检查修改标点符号

Could you please help me to ensure that the punctuation marks are correct in the following text? Do not try to improve the text, if no mistake is found, tell me that this paragraph is good. If you find mistakes in punctuation marks, please list the mistakes you find in a two-column markdown table, put the original text in the first column, and put the corrected text in the second column, please only list the mistakes and provide the corrected text in the end.

9. 检查参考⽂献格式

I’d like you to serve as a reference editor for a research manuscript. I will supply you with five reference templates that you should use as guidelines. Following that, I will provide additional references for which you’ll need to examine formatting aspects such as punctuation placement and spacing. It is essential that the provided references align cohesively with the five initial templates. Provide me with any necessary corrections or suggestions for improve the text. Give a markdown table with three columns where the first is the original text, second is the fixed text, explanation in the third column, and then provide all fixed references. Below are the five example templates and references needed to be fixed:

10. 写摘要

第—步：输⼊这条预设指令，完成全⽂输⼊，可能要多分⼏次输⼊，防⽌字数过多。

预设指令： 下⾯我将分部分给你输⼊我的⽂章（manuscript），你在收到每部分内容后，只需回 复“已收到”表示确认。最后，请将这些部分综合起来，完成我的要求。

第⼆步：输⼊这条指令：

Based on the manuscript that I have just provided to you, I want you to act as an assistant for drafting a scientific abstract considering its entire contents. The abstract should commence with a sentence capturing the broad context, followed by a sentence outlining the manuscript’s unique contribution. Subsequently, a concise overview of the methods should be delivered. Then write a few sentences for the key findings. To wrap up the abstract, a sentence or two elucidating the broader impact or implications of the study is required.

11. 写 Cover letter， 需要提供⽂章题⽬和摘要****有2024年-11-28

I want you to act as an academic journal editor. I will provide you with the title and abstract of my manuscript. You need to write a format cover letter for submitting the manuscript to the Nature journal. You should state that the manuscript did not consider for publication in any other journal. Briefly introduce the merit of the manuscript and provide a short summary to point out the importance of the results for a scientific audience. The title and abstract are as follows:

12. 取标题

I want you to act as an academic journal editor. I am going to provide you an abstract of manuscript and you provide me with 5 good titles in English for a research paper and give explanation for why this title is good. Provide your output as a markdown table with two columns and with head in Chinese. First column gives titles in English and second column provides explanation in Chinese. The following text is the abstract: 指令后⾯加上你⽂章的摘要

13. 按照 APA 格式校正参考⽂献格式

⾸先请按照 APA 格式对以下参考⽂献格式进⾏校正，调整为严格符合 APA 的⽂献格式，最 后我需要将参考⽂献以 Markdown 格式的代码块形式展示。需要注意的是期刊名称要全称， 且斜体(这⾥可以添加其他要求)，下⾯是我的参考⽂献：

14. 改写或重写整个段落的⽅法(先总结，再重写)

Please summarize the following text into a sentence and 5 to 10 keywords (这个是总结指令)：

Write new content based on the above summary sentence and including all keywords. (这是重写的 指令)

15. ⼀键写摘要指令。有2024年-9-7

Please read through the uploaded manuscript and write an abstract in English for it. The abstract should initiate with a comprehensive summary of the broader context or background of the study, followed by a statement that describe the gaps, limitations or issues. Then, describe the research methods used in the manuscript. After that, write 3-5 sentences showing the key findings. In the end, include a statement which underscores the unique value or significant contribution of the manuscript. After generating the abstract, give explanation in Chinese checking if you have followed the instruction in a markdown table.

16. 通过⽣成图表⽅式帮助理解数据

Could you create 10 visuals to represent different data according to your understanding of the above

dataset? Display the plots one by one with a brief introduction. (点击对话框左边+上传数 据，再输⼊这条指令即可)

17. 将段落总结成⼏个关键词和⼀个核⼼句⼦的指令，用来辅助精读⽂献

Please summarize the text below by identifying three keywords and one sentence that encapsulate the core content and emphasize the key points:

18. ChatGPT 多模态深度解读⽂献中配图的指令（上传图⽚后，添加这条指令）

This is a figure from a paper published on the journal of [杂志名字] with the title [⽂章标题]. The legend of the figure is [图的标题]. Please help me to interpret the figure as an expert in that field.

19. Consensus或者 Scispace 为指定⽂本找参考⽂献指令：有-2024年-12月15 日

Please search for relevant references for the following text. References must be published in high- impact SCI journals, such as Science, Cell, Nature, or high-impact sub-journals, and must have been published within the past three years. Additionally, the references should be searchable in the PubMed database. Provide at least one reference for each sentence. Then insert the references with the format (first author et al., year) into proper positions. Please also provide a reference list in the end of the text:

20. 降重指令

Please paraphrase the following text to lower the similar phrase to academic publications. You can replace phrases or reorder the content. Please do not replace the academic terms and do keep the passive and active tone consistent. Please also make sure your output in an academic tone. To avoid the AI detection, the text needs to have proper amount of perplexity and burstiness. Summarize what you have done to the text in the end of you output in Chinese:

21. 检查 SCI 细节的指令（标点，缩进，缩写，公式等等）

Please review my manuscript for punctuation, including spaces and indentations. Check that all formulas are correct, ensure consistency in decimal points, abbreviations, and verify the correctness of abbreviations. Do not alter any content. Based on your expertise, also inspect other potential areas of error. Highlight any mistakes and provide suggestions for correction. Your output will be a three-

（⾼亮部分去掉即为⽆表格版， 适合快速检查）

22. 寻找研究领域相关的参考⽂献：

I will send you some information about my research content. Please help me find references about my research topic online, introduce the research methods and conclusions ofthe references, please provide me with up-to-date, highly cited references ,find the name of the journal and the publication time of the reference, and make a table. The first column is the name of the reference, the second column is the research method and the research conclusion, and the third column is the name of the journal. The fourth column is publication time. After this dialogue, the whole word will answer me in Chinese.

23. Nature 期刊级别的翻译指令

Below l would like to use your translation function, please use nature and other standard academic paper grammar requirements to help me translate my paper paragraphs, and given in the form of a table, the left side is the Chinese sentences before the translation. The right side is the English sentences after the translation. Pay attention to the grammatical problems and please help me to revise them together. Finally, provide the entire edited paragraph. I will give you the sentences of my paper below:

24. Nature 杂志上发表推荐的润⾊指令

中文版： 我正在为一个领先的[学科]学术期刊撰写一篇关于[主题]的论文。我在下一节 中试图表达的[具体点]是什么， 请帮我重新表述以确保清晰、连贯和简洁，并确保每一段都 能流畅过渡到下一段。去除行话，使用专业语调。

英文版：I am writing a paper for a leading academic journal. I have expressed the sentences in the following section. Please rephrase the text so that it is clarity, coherence and conciseness, and make sure that each paragraph flows smoothly from one to the next. Remove jargon. Use a professional tone and give me the results in tabular form.

25.提取⽂献中的公式指令，直接复制到word中输出

I need to cite the above formula in my paper. Please recognize the formula and output it in MathML format so I can export it to Word.

26. 前言（Introduction）写作指令

首先根据自己的论⽂内容罗列出⼀个大纲，再运用以下指令（适用于论⽂刚开始动笔）：

中文版： 作为一位拥有数十年论文写作和编辑经验的社会科学教授（这里需要结合自己 的专业），你需要写一篇关于[主题]的引言。引言应包括说明该主题重要性的理由，并对论 文的主要部分进行简要概述。该部分应先为读者设定背景，解释为什么该主题是相关和重要 的，并介绍主要的研究问题和假设。引言部分应通过分析和综合以下来源展示高级的阅读理 解能力， 并用APA格式进行文中引用和参考文献的正确引用。引言应包括以下几个部分： [大纲]。

英文版： You are a social science professor（同理） with decades of paper writing and editing experience. You need to write an introduction on the topic of [topic]. The introduction should include a rationale for the topic’s importance and a brief outline of the paper’s main sections. This section should at first set the stage for the reader, explaining why the topic is relevant and significant and introducing the main research questions and hypotheses. The introduction should demonstrate advanced reading comprehension skills by analyzing and synthesizing the following sources and utilizing APA in-text citation format to cite and reference all sources used properly. The introduction should include the following sections: [outline].

27.⼀键修改参考⽂献格式指令：

假如你是一名[SCI期刊如Nature]审稿人，你非常在意投稿的文献引用格式，这是我写的 一篇论文，请你帮我检查一下该论文的文献引用是否符合[GB/T 7714或APA或MLA或 Chicago]标准格式。要求以表格的形式罗列出不符合标准的地方及修改意见。

If you are a reviewer for a SCI journal such as Nature, and you are very concerned about the citation format of your submission, please help me check if the citation format of my paper conforms to the [standard format of GB/T 7714, APA, MLA, or Chicago]. Request to list the areas that do not meet the standards and the suggested modifications in the form of a table.

28.论⽂降AI率，2种⽅式，自行体验：

方法1： 第一步： 检查ai率： (打开GPTs——zero gpt)请帮我检测这段文本的ai率(粘贴 论文段落或者上传论文附件)

Please help me check the AI rate of this text (paste the paper paragraph or upload the paper attachment)

第二步：降ai率：(打开GPTs——ai humanizer pro/ humanizer pro)请帮我降低这段文本的 ai率(粘贴论文段落或者上传论文附件)

Please help me reduce theAIrate of this text (paste paragraphs or uploading paper attachments)

方法2:上传《降AI率-200个AI高频词汇.pdf》请仔细 研究我上传的附件，该附件列举了很多AI高频词汇和句式，然后改写我的论文，要求遇到高 频词汇请用其他词汇代替，遇到高频句式请改写(粘贴论文段落或者上传论文附件)

Please carefully study the attachment I uploaded, which lists many high-frequency AI vocabulary and sentence structures. Then rewrite my paper, requesting that high-frequency vocabulary be replaced with other vocabulary and high-frequency sentence structures be rewritten (by pasting paragraphs or uploading paper attachments).

29.Nature上发表的修改⽂章摘要的指令.(Nature 标题原⽂：Chatbots in science: What

can ChatGPT do for you?)

You are a professional copy editor with ample experience handling scientific texts. Revise the following abstract from a manuscript so that it follows a context–content–conclusion scheme. (1) The context portion communicates to the reader the gap that the paper will fill. The first sentence orients the reader by introducing the broader field. Then, the context is narrowed until it lands on the open question that the research answers. A successful context section distinguishes the research’s contributions from the current state of the art, communicating what is missing in the literature (that is, the specific gap) and why that matters (that is, the connection between the specific gap and the broader context). (2) The content portion (for example, ‘here, we …’) first describes the new method or approach that was used to fill the gap, then presents an executive summary of results. (3) The conclusion portion interprets the results to answer the question that was posed at the end of the context portion. There might be a second part to the conclusion portion that highlights how this conclusion moves the broader field forward (for example, ‘broader significance’).

中文指令：

您是一位专业的文字编辑，在处理科学文本方面拥有丰富的经验。请修改以下手稿摘要， 使其遵循背景-内容-结论的格式。（1）背景部分向读者传达论文将填补的空白。第一句话 通过介绍更广泛的领域来引导读者。然后，背景被缩小，直到它落在研究回答的开放性问题 上。成功的背景部分将研究的贡献与当前的技术水平区分开来，传达文献中缺少的内容（即 具体差距）及其重要性（即具体差距与更广泛背景之间的联系）。（2） 内容部分（例如，

“在这里，我们 ……”）首先描述用于填补空白的新方法或方法，然后提供结果的执行摘要。

（3）结论部分解释结果以回答在背景部分末尾提出的问题。结论部分可能还有第二部分， 强调这个结论如何推动更广泛的领域向前发展（例如， “更广泛的意义”）（注：可结合自己 文章的灵活修改指令内容）

30. 论⽂期刊匹配

I want you to act as a scientific manuscript matcher. I will provide you with the title, abstract and key words of my scientific manuscript, respectively. Your task is analyzing my title, abstract and key words synthetically to find the most related, reputable journals for potential publication of my research based on an analysis oftens of millions of citation connections in database, such as Web of Science, Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect and so on. You only need to provide me with the 15 most suitable journals. Your reply should include the name of journal, the cooresponding match score (The full score is ten). I want you to reply in text-based excel sheet and sort by matching scores in reverse order.My title is “XXX” My abstract is “XXX” My key words are “XXX”

我希望你能充当科学手稿的匹配者。我将分别向您提供我的科学手稿的标题、摘要和关 键词。你的任务是综合分析我的标题、摘要和关键词，根据对数据库中数以千万计的引文连 接的分析，如 Web of Science 、Pubmed、Scopus 、ScienceDirect 等，为我的研究找到最相关、最有信誉的期刊。你只需向我提供 15 种最合适的期刊。你的回复应该包括期刊名称，对应 的匹配分数（满分是 10 分）。我希望你在基于文本的excel 表格中进行回复，并按匹配分数 倒序排序。

31.论⽂续写指令

这个方法一般适合实在想不出什么内容，又希望增加字数的情况。

Based on the knowledge you have mastered about [xxx], polish and continue writing the above content to make the content richer and more complete.

根据你所掌握的关于[xxx]的知识，润色并续写上面的内容，使得内容更加丰富完整。

32.Canvas模型写综述的三大指令(canvas模型目前已整合在4o中了，要学会正确调用才 能 使 用 )

1.我⽬前对[选题如python爬虫在电商比价系统中的应用]感兴趣， 并开始准备撰写论⽂。 请从CNKI、Google Scholar 、JSTOR 、PubMed等数据库搜索关于这个领域近五年的相关文献 供我参考，包含学位论文，学术期刊，专利成果，学术会议等等

2.请阅读上面搜索到的文献资料，记录每篇⽂章的关键观点、论据、研究⽅法和结论。 要求深⼊理解作者的观点，并评估其论据的强度和局限性。

3.对不同⽂献中的观点和发现进⾏⽐较和对⽐。找出研究领域内的普遍趋势和理论争议。 并详细说明这些⽂献如何⽀持或挑战我的研究。

33. 回复审稿意见。

提示词： “你是一名具有多年经验的期刊审稿意见回复专家，熟悉高质量回复信的撰写要求。

我需要你帮助撰写以下回复： 1）针对审稿人提出的每条意见表达感谢；2）详细说明已完成 的修改或提供未修改的合理解释； 3）用礼貌且专业的语气处理可能的敏感问题，确保回复 简洁清晰： 审稿意见： [粘贴审稿意见]我的修改或解释： [粘贴草稿]

Prompt： “You are an experienced expert in responding to reviewers’ comments and are skilled at

crafting high-quality response letters. Please help draft the following response: 1) express gratitude for each comment; 2) explain in detail the changes made or provide justified reasons for unmodified points; 3) address sensitive issues with polite and professional language while keeping the response concise and clear:Reviewer’s Comments: [Paste reviewer’s comments]My Revisions or Explanations:

34.使用GPT deepresearch功能⼀键快速⽣成万字高分SCI综述，选择deepresearch即可，与其他模型⽆关！

请使用deepresearch功能，撰写一篇综述文章《XXX》， 字数一万字左右， 引用最近3 年80120篇高水平文献，尤其是XXX领域的进展，符合高分SCI发表标准。聚焦20222025 年最新研究;文献来自PubMed. Web of Science. Nature.Lancet Oncology等高影响力期刊

35.使用Grok3完美回复审稿意见,选择Supergrok模型进行调用

我投稿的文章正在进行返修流程，左边是我的手稿内容，右边是审稿人的具体意见，请 你根据评审意见与提供的稿件内容，逐条作出科学严谨、逻辑清晰的完美respond。

36、用4o绘制机制图指令

第一步，选择4o模型，让他给出详细的prompt.

1.这是我文章的手稿，请你仔细、深入阅读并理解这篇论文的具体详细内容与详细的机 制后，首先给出你对这篇文章的核心信号轴的详细描述，请注意一定要详细具体，因为接下 来我需要利用4o详细绘制这篇文章的机制图，现在，请你首先给出这篇论文的详细机制内容， 接着，给出绘制机制图的详细prompt.

2.请根据以上内容，绘制一张高质量、科学风格的机制图，适合SCI期刊投稿。 如果出图后质量不佳。直接对话修改即可

37、GPT deepresearch+指令，全面优化省自然基金标书

角色设定

• 你是“省自然科学基金评审专家 + 科研项目申报辅导顾问”，同时具备学术写作与项 目论证经验。

总体目标

对《我的省自然基金标书》进行深度调研与逐段优化，显著提高中标率。

输出格式须便于我直接复制回 Word/LaTeX；每段给出：

o 修改后正文（用 ==修改后== 标识）。

o 修改要点解释（用 // 说明： 开头，简洁列出逻辑/语言/规范层面的改进）。

引入最新文献、前沿数据或政策要点时，给出简短出处（如“[Li2024, Nature]”）。 具体评审维度（按省自然基金评审表权重排序，请逐项强化）：

1. 科学问题的重要性与创新性
2. 研究目标明确性
3. 技术路线与可行性
4. 研究基础与团队优势
5. 预期成果与学术/社会价值
6. 经费预算合理性 优化要求与步骤

• Step 1 全局扫描：先快速浏览全文，列出可能被评审扣分的常见风险点（如目标模 糊、创新点不够聚焦、数据支撑不足等）。

• Step 2 逐段深改：按正文顺序，对每一段执行：

1. 精炼/重组句子结构，提升逻辑流畅度；

嵌入与本段主题最匹配的最新研究或政策动向（必要时提出“可添加××引用”建议）；

3. 突出评审关注的关键词（创新点、关键技术、可行性量化指标等）；

检查格式、专业术语、标点、数字单位、图表编号；

输出“==修改后==”正文 + “// 说明：”简述改动缘由(≤3 行）。

• Step 3 回顾与自检：完成全部段落后，生成一份评审维度对照表，自评打分并指出 仍可能的薄弱环节。

• Step 4 待续互动：如发现信息缺口或需原始数据支撑，请主动列出精确信息清单并 向我提问。

标书原文

《你的原始标书文本》

38、GPT o3模型配合指令⼀键为⽂本段落寻找对应参考⽂献

1. 中文 Prompt

请阅读以下中文论文段落

（这里插入你的文本段落， 注意不要太长）。

任务：

1、找出段落中每一句需要文献支撑的论断或数据。

2、为每个论点检索至少 1 篇在PubMed 、Web of Science等数据库可查的真实期刊文献（可 选中文或英文文献）。

3、生成符合 GB/T 7714—2015 标准（这个标准可以自行修改符合自己论文要求的） 的参 考文献条目：

• 中文文献保留中文格式；
• 英文文献保留英文原文。

4、在段落相应位置插入上标引用标记 序号序号（例：研究表明OSA 与 BMI 正相关1）。

5、输出两部分：

A. 已插入引用的段落（保持原段落语言不变，仅添加引用标记）；

B. 参考文献列表（按引用次序排列）。

6、如暂无法找到可靠出处，请在段落对应处标记 来源待补来源待补并在参考文献列表中 注明。

7、若原段落已含不完整引用，请补全并规范化。

输出示例结构：

段落（已插入引用）

…

参考文献（GB/T 7714—2015）

1 作者. 题名[J]. 刊名, 年, 卷(期): 页码.

2…

2. 英文 Prompt

Please read the following paragraph(s) of my Chinese manuscript ().

Your tasks:

1、 Identify every statement or data point that requires citation.

2、 Locate at least one authentic, peer-reviewed reference (Chinese or international) for each claim; the source must be discoverable in databases such as PubMed, or Web of Science.

3、 Provide full reference entries in GB/T 7714—2015 format:

Keep Chinese sources in Chinese;

Keep English sources in English.

4、 Insert in-text citation markers as superscripted numbers nn at the appropriate places within the paragraph (e.g., “OSA correlates positively with BMI1”).

5、 Return two sections:

A. Paragraph with citations inserted (original wording retained, only citation markers added);

B. Reference list ordered by appearance.

6、 If no reliable source can be found, mark the spot with citationneededcitation needed and note it in the list.

7、Standardize and complete any incomplete citations already present in the text. Output template:

Paragraph (with citations)

…

References (GB/T 7714—2015)

11 Author. Title[J]. Journal, Year, Volume(Issue): Pages.

22 …

39、根据论⽂手稿写摘要 （需调用supergrok）

1、英文版

Please write a concise and professional academic abstract in English (150-250 words) for my manuscript, intended for submission to a high-impact JCR Q1 SCI journal. The abstract should follow standard academic conventions, including a clear statement of the research problem, objectives, methods, key results, and significance of the findings. Ensure the language is precise, formal, and suitable for a multidisciplinary scientific audience. Base the abstract on the content of the provided manuscript, accurately reflecting its core contributions and adhering to the journal’s expectations for clarity and rigor. Avoid speculative language and ensure the abstract is self-contained, with no references to external sources.

2、中文版

请为我的英文手稿撰写一篇简洁且专业的中文学术摘要（150-250字），用于投稿至JCR一 区的SCI高分杂志。摘要需符合学术规范，清晰概述研究问题、目标、方法、主要结果及 其重要性。语言需精确、正式，适合多学科的科学读者群体。摘要内容需基于手稿的核心 贡献，准确反映其学术价值，并符合期刊对清晰度和严谨性的要求。避免使用推测性语言， 确保摘要独立完整，不引用外部来源。

40、Chatgpt-o3模型根据论⽂内容写讨论（前提是结果及前面部分已写好）

中文 Prompt

你是一位擅长撰写高分SCI论文的学术写作专家。现在我有一个已完成结果部分的手稿，

但讨论部分仍为空白。请根据手稿的内容，撰写一个高质量的讨论部分，符合高影响力 SCI期刊（如Nature 、Cell等） 的写作标准。讨论部分需涵盖以下要点， 并确保逻辑清晰、 语言精准、内容严谨：

1、重申研究目标和主要发现：以1-2句简洁概括研究的主要结果，强调其意义，避免直接 重复结果部分的描述性语句。

2、 结果的解释与分析： 深入分析每个主要结果的含义，探讨可能的机制、原因或影响， 基于数据或理论支持，避免过度推测，确保与研究假设相关。

3、与已有研究的比较：将本研究结果与领域内近期高影响力文献（10-20篇）进行对比， 突出一致性或差异性，分析差异原因，强调本研究的创新点（如填补知识空白、改进方法 等）。

4、研究的意义与影响： 阐明结果的学术价值（如理论推进）和潜在应用（如技术、临床、 政策等），适度展望未来研究方向，避免夸大。

5、 局限性与不足： 诚实指出研究的局限性（如样本量、方法限制） ，分析其对结果的影 响，提出未来改进建议，语气积极，确保不削弱研究价值。

6、总结与展望：用1-2句总结讨论核心内容，强化研究贡献，提出具体未来研究方向，避 免引入新信息。

具体要求：

输出讨论部分的总长度为手稿的20-30%，每段聚焦一个要点，段落间衔接自然。

语言需学术化、简洁精准，避免模糊词语（如“可能”“似乎”过多），使用客观语气。 引用需假设基于手稿中已有的参考文献，格式为“作者（年份）”,无需具体列出。

突出研究的创新性和科学价值，预判审稿人可能提出的问题（如方法局限、结果普适性）， 提前回应。

根据手稿结果部分的主题和领域，生成与研究内容高度相关的讨论，避免泛泛而谈。

避免直接复制结果部分的语句，讨论需为解读和分析，而非描述。

输出的讨论部分应直接可用，适合插入手稿，无需进一步大幅修改。

请根据手稿结果部分的主题、数据和研究背景，生成一个完整的讨论部分，确保内容定制 化、逻辑连贯，满足高分SCI论文的要求。在讨论部分的末尾，请以编号形式列出文中引 用的参考文献。每条参考文献应遵循APA格式，包含完整标题及DOI，便于追溯来源。如果 需要更多手稿细节，请提示我补充具体信息。

English Prompt

You are an expert in academic writing, specializing in crafting high-impact SCI papers. I have a manuscript with a completed Results section, but the Discussion section is still blank. Please write a high-quality Discussion section based on the manuscript content, adhering to the standards of high-impact SCI journals (e.g., Nature, Cell). The Discussion should cover the following key points, ensuring logical clarity, precise language, and rigorous content:

1 、Restate Research Objectives and Key Findings: Briefly summarize the main findings in 1-2 sentences, emphasizing their significance, without repeating the descriptive statements from the Results section.

2、 Interpretation and Analysis of Results: Provide an in-depth analysis of each key finding, exploring possible mechanisms, causes, or implications, supported by data or theoretical frameworks, avoiding over-speculation, and linking to the study’s hypotheses.

3 、Comparison with Existing Literature: Compare the study’s findings with recent high-impact literature in the field (10-20 references), highlighting consistencies or discrepancies, explaining reasons for differences, and emphasizing the study’s novel contributions (e.g., filling knowledge gaps, improving methods).

4 、Significance and Impact: Discuss the academic value (e.g., advancing theory) and potential applications (e.g., technological, clinical, or policy implications), with a moderate outlook on future research directions, avoiding exaggeration.

5 、Limitations and Shortcomings: Honestly identify the study’s limitations (e.g., sample size, methodological constraints), analyze their impact on the results, and suggest improvements for future studies, maintaining a positive tone to avoid undermining the study’s value.

6 、Summary and Outlook: Conclude with a 1-2 sentence summary of the discussion’s core points, reinforcing the study’s contributions, and proposing specific future research directions, without introducing new information.

Specific Requirements:

The Discussion section should account for 20-30% of the manuscript length, with each point addressed in dedicated paragraphs and smooth transitions between them.

Use concise, academic language, avoiding vague terms (e.g., excessive use of“may” or “seems”), and maintain an objective tone.

References should be assumed from the manuscript’s existing bibliography, cited as “Author (Year),” without listing specific sources.

Highlight the study’s novelty and scientific value, anticipating potential reviewer concerns (e.g., methodological limitations, generalizability) and addressing them proactively.

Tailor the discussion to the manuscript’s theme, data, and field, ensuring relevance and avoiding generic statements.

Avoid reproducing Results section statements; the Discussion should focus on interpretation and analysis, not description.

The output should be a polished Discussion section, ready for direct inclusion in the manuscript with minimal revisions.

Please generate a complete Discussion section based on the theme, data, and context of the manuscript’s Results section, ensuring a customized, coherent, and high-quality output that meets the standards of high-impact SCI papers. At the end of the Discussion section, please provide the references cited in the text in numbered format. Each reference should follow APA style and include the full title and DOI to facilitate traceability. If more manuscript details are needed, prompt me to provide specific information.

41、Grok4/GPTo3模型全面检查硕博士论⽂的错误（语法和拼写错误、逻辑性、学术严

谨性、结构和格式问题及整体修改意见）

中文版本的Prompt：

你是一个经验丰富的学术编辑和博士论文审阅专家，专精于检查学术论文的准确性、流畅 性和严谨性。现在，我提供给你一篇完整的博士毕业论文文本。请你仔细阅读并分析整个 论文，从以下几个方面进行全面检查和反馈：

1.语法和拼写错误：识别并列出所有语法错误、拼写错误、标点符号使用不当（包括标题 中的符号，如冒号、破折号等），并建议修正。

2.表达流畅性：检查句子结构是否流畅、自然，是否存在awkward phrasing、冗余表达、 模糊词汇或不连贯的段落过渡。针对每个问题，提供改进建议，使语言更清晰和学术化。

3.学术严谨性：评估内容的逻辑一致性、论证是否充分、术语使用是否准确和一致、引 用格式是否规范（例如APA、MLA等标准）、数据和图表的准确性、避免主观偏见或未经证 实的声明。如果有不严谨之处，指出并建议如何加强。

4.结构和格式问题：检查标题和子标题的格式一致性、章节组织是否合理、摘要、引言、 文献综述、方法论、结果、讨论和结论的部分是否完整和连贯。注意任何格式错误，如字 体、间距或参考文献列表。

5.整体建议：在检查结束后，提供一个总结，包括论文的强项、主要问题列表（按严重 程度排序），以及总体改进建议。确保你的反馈具体、可操作，并引用论文中的具体位置 （如页码、段落或句子）来支持你的评论。

请以结构化的格式输出你的反馈，例如使用编号列表或表格，便于我参考。论文文本如下： [在这里插入你的论文全文]。

English Version of the Prompt:

You are an experienced academic editor and PhD thesis reviewer, specializing in checking the accuracy, fluency, and rigor of academic papers. Now, I provide you with the full text of a completed PhD thesis. Please carefully read and analyze the entire thesis, conducting a comprehensive review and feedback from the following aspects:

Grammar and Spelling Errors: Identify and list all grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, improper punctuation usage (including symbols in titles, such as colons, dashes, etc.), and suggest corrections.

Expression Fluency: Check if sentence structures are smooth and natural, and identify any awkward phrasing, redundant expressions, ambiguous vocabulary, or incoherent paragraph transitions. For each issue, provide improvement suggestions to make the language clearer and more academic.

Academic Rigor: Evaluate the logical consistency of the content, whether arguments are sufficiently supported, if terminology is used accurately and consistently, if citation formats are standardized (e.g., APA, MLA, etc.), the accuracy of data and figures, and avoidance of subjective biases or unsubstantiated claims. If there are any lacks in rigor, point them out and suggest how to strengthen them.

Structure and Formatting Issues**: Check the consistency of title and subtitle formats, whether

the chapter organization is reasonable, and if sections like abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion are complete and coherent. Note any formatting errors, such as font, spacing, or reference list.

Overall Suggestions: After the review, provide a summary including the thesis’s strengths, a list of major issues (sorted by severity), and general improvement recommendations. Ensure your feedback is specific, actionable, and supported by references to specific locations in the thesis (e.g., page numbers, paragraphs, or sentences).

Please output your feedback in a structured format, such as numbered lists or tables, for easy reference. The thesis text is as follows: [Insert your full thesis text here].

42、Grok4/GPTo3模型全面检查SCI手稿的错误

中文版本的Prompt：

你是一个经验丰富的学术编辑和SCI论文审阅专家，专精于检查英文SCI手稿的准确性、流 畅性、逻辑性和严谨性，以确保其能顺利通过期刊编辑和审稿人的审查。现在，我提供给 你一篇完整的英文SCI论文手稿文本。请你仔细阅读并分析整个手稿，从以下几个方面进 行全面检查和反馈，重点关注任何标题符号的使用不当、表达不流畅、逻辑性问题以及不 严谨的学术表述：

1.语法和拼写错误：识别并列出所有语法错误、拼写错误、标点符号使用不当（包括标题 中的符号，如冒号、破折号、逗号等），并建议具体的修正方案。

2.表达流畅性：检查句子结构是否流畅、自然，是否存在awkward phrasing、冗余表达、 模糊词汇、awkward transitions或不连贯的段落。针对每个问题，提供改进建议，使语 言更清晰、精确和符合学术英语规范。

3.逻辑性和学术严谨性：评估内容的逻辑一致性、论证是否充分且连贯、术语使用是否准 确和一致、数据和图表的准确性、避免主观偏见或未经证实的声明、方法论的完整性、结 果与讨论的逻辑连接。如果存在逻辑跳跃、不严谨之处或潜在的科学漏洞，指出并建议如 何加强论证、添加证据或调整结构，以提升手稿的学术质量。

4.结构和格式问题：检查标题和子标题的格式一致性、章节组织是否合理（包括摘要、引 言、文献综述、材料与方法、结果、讨论、结论和参考文献）、图表和补充材料的规范性。 注意任何格式错误，如字体、间距、引用格式（例如Vancouver、APA等期刊常用标准）或 不符合SCI期刊通用要求的元素。

5.整体建议：在检查结束后，提供一个总结，包括手稿的强项、主要问题列表（按严重程 度排序，例如可能导致拒稿的高风险问题优先）、以及总体改进建议，以帮助手稿完美通 过编辑审查。确保你的反馈具体、可操作，并引用手稿中的具体位置（如页码、段落、句 子或图表编号）来支持你的评论。

请以结构化的格式输出你的反馈，例如使用编号列表、表格或 bullet points，便于我参 考和修改。手稿文本如下： [在这里插入你的完整SCI手稿文本]。

English Version of the Prompt:

You are an experienced academic editor and SCI manuscript reviewer, specializing in checking the accuracy, fluency, logic, and rigor of English SCI papers to ensure they can smoothly pass through journal editors’ and reviewers’ scrutiny. Now, I provide you with the full text of a completed English SCI manuscript. Please carefully read and analyze the entire manuscript, conducting a comprehensive review and feedback from the following aspects, with a focus on any improper use of title symbols, awkward expressions, poor logic, and academic rigor issues:

Grammar and Spelling Errors: Identify and list all grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, improper punctuation usage (including symbols in titles, such as colons, dashes, commas, etc.), and suggest specific correction schemes.

Expression Fluency: Check if sentence structures are smooth and natural, and identify any awkward phrasing, redundant expressions, ambiguous vocabulary, awkward transitions, or incoherent paragraphs. For each issue, provide improvement suggestions to make the language clearer, more precise, and in line with academic English standards.

Logic and Academic Rigor: Evaluate the logical consistency of the content, whether arguments

are sufficiently supported and coherent, if terminology is used accurately and consistently, the accuracy of data and figures, avoidance of subjective biases or unsubstantiated claims, the completeness of methodology, and the logical connection between results and discussion. If there are logical gaps, lacks in rigor, or potential scientific flaws, point them out and suggest how to strengthen arguments, add evidence, or adjust the structure to enhance the manuscript’s academic quality.

Structure and Formatting Issues: Check the consistency of title and subtitle formats, whether the chapter organization is reasonable (including abstract, introduction, literature review, materials and methods, results, discussion, conclusion, and references), and the standardization of figures, tables, and supplementary materials. Note any formatting errors, such as font, spacing, citation formats (e.g., Vancouver, APA, or other common journal standards), or elements that do not meet general SCI journal requirements.

Overall Suggestions: After the review, provide a summary including the manuscript’s strengths, a list of major issues (sorted by severity, e.g., high-risk issues that could lead to rejection prioritized), and general improvement recommendations to help the manuscript perfectly pass editorial review. Ensure your feedback is specific, actionable, and supported by references to specific locations in the manuscript (e.g., page numbers, paragraphs, sentences, or figure/table numbers).

Please output your feedback in a structured format, such as numbered lists, tables, or bullet points,

for easy reference and revision. The manuscript text is as follows: [Insert your full SCI manuscript text here].

43、Grok4/GPTo3模型根据SCI手稿写Introduction

中文Prompt

你是一位经验丰富的SCI论文写作专家， 专注于帮助作者撰写高影响因子期刊（如Nature、 Science 、Cell等JCR一区期刊） 的Introduction部分。你的目标是创建一个高质量、吸引人 的Introduction，确保它符合高分论文的标准：采用“漏斗式”或“倒三角”结构，从广义 背景逐步缩小到具体研究焦点；长度控制在500-1000字左右；保持简洁、逻辑清晰，避免 冗长历史回顾或夸张表述（如“首次”“革命性”） ；时态上，背景描述常用现在时，先 前研究常用过去时；强调跨学科影响、实际应用和社会意义；引用策略使用最新、高影响 因子的参考文献，避免过多无关引用。

现在， 用户提供了一篇SCI文章手稿的其他部分内容（包括Methods 、Results 、Discussion 等），但Introduction部分尚未完成。请基于手稿的内容，严格遵循以下典型构成要素，按 顺序构建Introduction：

引人入胜的开头（Hook）： 以一个强有力的开头吸引读者注意力，例如引用惊人事 实、统计数据、问题、轶事或当前热点。目的是快速说明主题的重要性，并激发读者兴趣。 确保与手稿的核心主题（如[用户手稿主题，例如特定领域的问题]）相关联。

**背景介绍（Background） **：提供主题的广泛上下文，建立研究领域。包括该领域的 总体情况、为什么重要，以及简要回顾相关文献（但不深入细节）。从全球视角入手，逐 步聚焦到具体问题。引用高质量、近期参考文献（包括综述文章），强调现有知识的基础。 整合手稿中的关键概念和先前研究。

问题陈述与知识差距（Research Problem/Gap）：指出当前研究的不足或空白。评价 现有解决方案的优势与局限，识别未解决的问题（如方法缺陷、数据缺失或新兴挑战）。 这部分强调本文的创新点，例如“尽管X已广泛研究，但Y方面仍缺乏关注”。基于手稿 的结果和讨论，突出手稿如何填补这些差距。

研究目标与假设（Objectives/Hypothesis）：明确陈述本文的目的、研究问题或假设。 解释拟解决的问题、采用的策略， 以及预期贡献。目标应具体、可量化，并与期刊定位一 致（如强调实际影响）。从手稿的方法和结果中提炼出核心目标。

**论文结构概述（Optional Roadmap） ** ：简要描述论文的整体结构，例如“本文第二 节讨论方法，第三节呈现结果……”。这有助于读者导航，尤其在非标准格式的论文中。

写作提示：

• 逻辑流畅：从“什么是问题？”“现有解决方案？”“其局限？”逐步到“本文如何解 决？”。
• 确保句子简洁吸引人，解释所有缩写。
• 避免透露结果（留给结果部分）。
• 整体强调原创性和全球视角，聚焦于问题解决，以适合JCR一区期刊的叙事性和影响力。
• 如果手稿中有特定数据、模型或发现，请自然融入背景和差距中，但不泄露结果。
• 输出时，提供完整的Introduction文本，并标注每个部分的标题以便用户参考。

请基于以下手稿内容[用户在此插入手稿的其他部分内容， 例如Methods 、Results等]生成 Introduction。

英文Prompt

You are an experienced SCI paper writing expert, specializing in crafting Introduction sections for high-impact journals (such as Nature, Science, Cell, and other JCR Q1 journals). Your goal is to create a high-quality, engaging Introduction that adheres to high-score paper standards: employing a “funnel” or “inverted triangle” structure, starting from broad background and narrowing to the specific research focus; keeping the length between 500-1000 words; maintaining conciseness, logical clarity, avoiding lengthy historical reviews or exaggerated claims (e.g., “first” or “revolutionary”); using present tense for background descriptions and past tense for prior studies; emphasizing interdisciplinary impact, practical applications, and societal significance; citation strategy involves using recent, high-impact references without excessive irrelevant citations.

The user has provided a SCI manuscript with all sections completed except the Introduction (including Methods, Results, Discussion, etc.). Based on the manuscript’s content, strictly follow the typical structure below to build the Introduction in sequence:

Engaging Opening (Hook): Start with a compelling hook to capture reader attention, such as citing a striking fact, statistic, question, anecdote, or current hotspot. The purpose is to quickly illustrate the topic’s importance and spark interest. Ensure it aligns with the manuscript’s core theme (e.g., [user’s manuscript theme, such as a specific field issue]).

Background Introduction (Background): Provide a broad context for the topic, establishing the research territory. Include the overall state of the field, why it matters, and a brief review of relevant literature (without delving into details). Start from a global perspective and gradually focus on the specific issue. Cite high-quality, recent references (including review articles) to underscore the foundation of existing knowledge. Integrate key concepts and prior studies from the manuscript.

Problem Statement and Knowledge Gap (Research Problem/Gap): Identify the deficiencies or gaps in current research. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing solutions, pinpointing unresolved issues (e.g., methodological flaws, data absences, or emerging challenges). This section highlights the novelty of the paper, such as “Although X has been extensively studied, Y remains underexplored.” Draw from the manuscript’s results and discussion to emphasize how it addresses these gaps.

Research Objectives and Hypothesis (Objectives/Hypothesis): Clearly state the paper’s aims, research questions, or hypotheses. Explain the problems to be solved, strategies employed, and expected contributions. Objectives should be specific, measurable, and aligned with the journal’s focus (e.g., stressing real-world impact). Extract core objectives from the manuscript’s methods and results.

Paper Structure Overview (Optional Roadmap): Briefly outline the paper’s overall structure, e.g., “Section 2 discusses the methods, Section 3 presents the results…”. This aids reader navigation, especially in non-standard IMRaD formats.

Writing Tips:

• Ensure logical flow: Progress from “What is the problem?” to “Existing solutions?” to “Their limitations?” and finally to “How this paper addresses it?”.
• Keep sentences concise and engaging, explaining all abbreviations.
• Avoid revealing results (reserve for the Results section).
• Overall, emphasize originality and global perspective, focusing on problem-solving to suit the narrative style and impact of JCR Q1 journals.
• If the manuscript includes specific data, models, or findings, integrate them naturally into the background and gap without spoiling results.
• In the output, provide the full Introduction text and label each section’s heading for user reference.

Please generate the Introduction based on the following manuscript content [user inserts the other sections of the manuscript here, such as Methods, Results, etc.].

44、Grok4/GPTo3模型根据专利主题撰写发明专利

中文 Prompt：

你是一个专业的专利撰写专家。请根据用户提供的发明主题，撰写一份完整的发明专利申 请草案。专利草案应包括以下部分：发明名称、发明背景、技术领域、现有技术的缺点、 发明目的、发明内容（包括技术方案、实施方式）、权利要求书、附图说明（如适用）。 确保语言正式、专业， 使用标准的专利格式。主题是： [插入用户提供的主题]。如果主题 涉及具体技术细节，请合理扩展并确保原创性和可专利性。输出应以中文撰写，并保持逻 辑清晰、结构完整。

English Prompt:

You are a professional patent drafting expert. Based on the invention theme provided by the user, draft a complete invention patent application. The patent draft should include the following sections: Title of the Invention, Background of the Invention, Technical Field, Disadvantages of the Prior Art, Purpose of the Invention, Content of the Invention (including technical solutions and embodiments), Claims, and Description of Drawings (if applicable). Ensure the language is formal and professional, using standard patent format. The theme is: [Insert the user-provided theme]. If the theme involves specific technical details, expand reasonably and ensure originality and patentability. The output should be written in English, maintaining clear logic and complete structure.

45.根据自己收集的⽂献，搭配deepresearch功能，结合指令⼀键撰写目标期刊的高质量

*综述《手把手教你用GPT的deepresearch功能，撰写*综 述》

英文版Prompt

You are an expert AI assistant specialized in medical research (这里需要根据自己的专业方向调 整).and scientific writing, with a deep understanding of high-impact journals in the JCR Q1 quartile (such as Nature Reviews, The Lancet, or JAMA series). Your task is to generate a comprehensive, high-quality review article based on the content of the uploaded PDF file provided by the user, who is a medical doctor (MD)(这里需要根据自己的专业内容调整). Thereview should be suitable for submission to a JCR Q1 journal like Nature Reviews Immunology（这里可以改为自己想要参 考的期刊）, adhering to rigorous academic standards: objective, evidence-based, well-structured, with critical analysis, synthesis of key findings, and implications for future research or clinical practice. Reference the structure of the example review article (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-024-01026-4) （这里改为自己想要参考的期刊链接） for formatting, including sections like Authors, Acknowledgements, and Ethics Declarations.

First, thoroughly analyze the uploaded PDF file using available tools if needed (e.g., browse_page for any linked content). Extract and summarize its key elements, including:

• Main topic or research focus (e.g., disease, treatment, mechanism, epidemiology).
• Key findings, data, methodologies, results, and conclusions.
• Any figures, tables, or references mentioned.
• Strengths, limitations, and gaps in the existing literature as implied or stated.

Structure the review article as follows, ensuring it is approximately 4000-6000 words (adjust based on content depth), written in formal, precise English with medical terminology where appropriate. Output the full review in markdown format for readability, incorporating visual elements like described figures/tables derived from the PDF:

Title: Create a concise, informative title that captures the essence of the review, e.g., “Advances in [Topic]: A Comprehensive Review Based on Recent Evidence”.

Authors: List fictional authors based on the user’s MD credentials (e.g., User MD as lead author, with AI-assisted contributors).

Abstract: 200-300 words, including background, objectives, methods (e.g., literature synthesis from the PDF and supplementary searches), key findings, and conclusions.

Introduction: Provide background on the topic, explain its significance in medicine, state the review’s objectives, and outline the scope based on the PDF.

Main Body: Divide into logical sections/subsections (e.g., Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approaches, Therapeutic Strategies, Clinical Outcomes), organized by mechanisms or themes as in the reference article. Synthesize information from the PDF, critically evaluate evidence, compare with broader literature (cite real sources), and highlight innovations or controversies. Include descriptions of figures/tables (e.g., “Fig. 1: Effects of [Mechanism] on [Outcome]”).

Discussion: Interpret the synthesized findings, discuss implications for clinical practice, research gaps, limitations of the PDF’s content, and future directions.

Conclusion: Summarize key takeaways and reiterate the review’s contributions.

References: Generate a list ofat least 30 references in Vancouver style. Include the uploaded PDF as the primary source (cite as Ref. 1). For the remaining, use tools like web_search (query: “PubMed [PDF topic] high-impact review 2023-2025”) or browse_page (e.g., on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to fetch real, traceable high-impact papers from sources like PubMed, Nature, The Lancet, or recent reviews. Include titles, authors, journals, years, and DOIs. Ensure diversity (e.g., 10+ from 2023-2025).

Glossary: If applicable, define 5-10 key terms from the PDF/topic.

Ensure the writing is:

• Original, plagiarism-free, and based solely on the PDF’s content without fabricating information; supplement with real literature via tools.
• Balanced, evidence-driven, and unbiased.
• Engaging yet professional, with clear transitions, subheadings, and potential for figures/tables if

derivable from the PDF.

• Compliant with ethical standards (e.g., no patient data misuse).

If the PDF lacks sufficient detail in any area, note it as a limitation and suggest areas for expansion. Use tools to enhance reference authenticity if needed. Finally, output the full review article in markdown format.

中文版 Optimized Prompt（中文版指令修改地方同上）

你是一位在医学研究和科学写作方面的专家AI助手，对JCR Q1区的高影响力期刊（如 Nature Reviews 、The Lancet或JAMA系列）有深入了解。你的任务是基于用户（一位医学 博士， MD） 上传的PDF文件内容，生成一篇全面、高质量的综述文章。该综述应适合提 交到JCR Q1期刊如Nature Reviews Immunology，遵守严格的学术标准：客观、基于证据、 结构良好，包括批判性分析、关键发现的综合， 以及对未来研究或临床实践的启示。参考 示例综述文章（ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-024-01026-4） 的结构进行格式化， 包括Authors 、Acknowledgements和Ethics Declarations等部分。

首先，使用可用工具（如browse_page用于任何链接内容）彻底分析上传的PDF文件。提取 并总结其关键元素，包括：

• 主要主题或研究焦点（例如，疾病、治疗、机制、流行病学）。
• 关键发现、数据、方法学、结果和结论。
• 提到的任何图表、表格或参考文献。
• 隐含或陈述的现有文献的优势、局限性和空白。

按照以下结构组织综述文章，确保约4000-6000字（根据内容深度调整） ，用正式、精确 的英语撰写， 并在适当处使用医学术语。以markdown格式输出完整的综述文章， 以提高 可读性，并融入从PDF衍生的视觉元素如图表/表格描述：

标题 (Title)：创建一个简洁、信息丰富的标题，捕捉综述的本质，例如“[主题]的进 展：基于近期证据的全面综述”。

作者 (Authors)：基于用户的MD资质列出虚构作者（例如， 用户MD作为主要作者， AI辅助贡献者）。

摘要 (Abstract) ：200-300字，包括背景、目标、方法（例如，从PDF的文献综合和 补充搜索）、关键发现和结论。

引言 (Introduction)：提供主题背景，解释其在医学中的意义，陈述综述的目标，并 基于PDF概述范围。

主体 (Main Body)：分为逻辑部分/子部分（例如，流行病学、病理生理学、诊断方 法、治疗策略、临床结果） ，按机制或主题组织，如参考文章所示。综合PDF中的信息， 批判性地评估证据，如果相关则与更广泛的文献比较（引用真实来源），并突出创新或争 议。包括图表/表格描述（例如，“Fig. 1 ：[机制]对[结果]的影响”）。

讨论 (Discussion)：解释综合发现，讨论对临床实践的启示、研究空白、PDF内容的 局限性，以及未来方向。

结论 (Conclusion)：总结关键要点，并重申综述的贡献。

参考文献 (References)：生成至少30个参考文献列表，使用Vancouver风格。将上传

的PDF作 为 主要 来 源（引 用 为 Ref. 1） 。 对 于 其 余 ， 使 用 工 具如web_search（查 询： “PubMed [PDF 主 题 ] high-impact review 2023-2025” ） 或 browse_page （例 如 ， 在 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov上）从PubMed 、Nature 、The Lancet或近期综述中获取真实、可溯 源的高影响力论文。包括标题、作者、期刊、年份和DOI。确保多样性（例如， 10+来自 2023-2025）。

致谢 (Acknowledgements)：致谢资助来源（虚构，例如基于用户输入）和工具协助。

作者信息 (Author Information)：包括贡献（例如，用户构思，AI起草）、通讯作者 和联系信息。

伦理声明 (Ethics Declarations)：陈述利益冲突（例如，无冲突）和伦理合规。

术语表 (Glossary)：如果适用，定义5-10个来自PDF/主题的关键术语。

附加信息 (Additional Information)：包括出版者声明（虚构）和权利与许可。

确保写作：

• 原创、无剽窃，仅基于PDF内容而不捏造信息；通过工具补充真实文献。
• 平衡、基于证据、无偏见。
• 引人入胜却专业，具有清晰的过渡、副标题， 以及如果可从PDF派生的潜在图表/表格。
• 符合伦理标准（例如，不滥用患者数据）。

如果PDF在任何领域缺乏足够细节，将其注明为局限性，并建议扩展领域。如果需要，使 用工具增强参考真实性。最后，以markdown格式输出完整的综述文章。

46.Chatgpt4o模型根据⽂章内容画机制图

中文prompt

根据以下肿瘤研究论文手稿内容，生成一张BioRender风格的机制图（mechanism figure）。 该图需精准反映手稿中描述的分子相互作用、信号通路及调控机制，确保内容科学准确且 与手稿高度相关。机制图应采用BioRender典型的简洁、矢量化的视觉风格，包含清晰的 分子、路径和注释，适合用于JCR 1区高影响力期刊投稿。图表需专业、精美，突出关键 生物学过程（如信号转导、基因调控或代谢途径）。

手稿内容：[请在此粘贴您的手稿内容，建议包含与机制图相关的关键段落或数据描述]

请直接生成图像，无需额外文本说明。

英文prompt

Using the provided tumor research manuscript content, create a mechanism figure in BioRender style. The figure must accurately depict the molecular interactions, signaling pathways, and regulatory mechanisms described in the manuscript, ensuring high scientific fidelity and relevance to the content. Adopt BioRender’s characteristic clean, vectorized visual style with clear molecular components, pathways, and annotations, suitable for submission to a high-impact JCR Q1 journal. The diagram should be professional and visually appealing, emphasizing key biological processes

(e.g., signal transduction, gene regulation, or metabolic pathways).

Please generate the image directly without additional text explanations.

Please thinking longer for a better answer.

47.Chatgpt-5-Thing模型根据手稿内容⼀键画bioRender风格的机制图

中文版：

你是一个专业的生物医学插图设计师，擅长使用bioRender风格创建机制图。现在，我将提 供一篇关于肿瘤分子基础研究的SCI论文手稿。请你首先使用thinking功能逐步分析手稿：

识别手稿中描述的最关键分子及其核心相互作用；2. 提取最核心的机制和关键通路，包 括主要信号通路、调控关系和相关生物过程，只优先选择最本质的部分；3. 确保所有元素 严格基于手稿原文，不添加任何外部假设或偏离内容，同时避免过多细节以保持简洁。基 于此分析，生成一张高质量的机制图，紧密结合手稿内容，深刻反映分子之间的相关作用 （如激活、抑制、结合等），但只保留核心关键通路的信息，确保图简洁、美观，避免要 素过多导致拥挤。机制图必须采用bioRender风格：简洁、专业、矢量图形，使用箭头、形 状和颜色编码表示关系（如绿色箭头表示激活，红色虚线表示抑制），并包括必要的细胞 组件、分子图标和通路流程，但不要显示任何标题。最终输出仅为生成的图像描述或直接 生成的图像文件。

[在这里粘贴您的论文手稿内容]

英文版：

You are a professional biomedical illustrator specializing in creating mechanism diagrams in the bioRender style. I will provide a manuscript from an SCI paper on tumor molecular basic research. First, use your thinking function to step-by-step analyze the manuscript: 1. Identify the most key molecules and their core interactions described in the manuscript; 2. Extract the most core mechanisms and key pathways, including primary signaling pathways, regulatory relationships, and related biological processes, prioritizing only the most essential parts; 3. Ensure all elements are strictly based on the original manuscript text, without adding any external assumptions or deviating from the content, while avoiding excessive details to maintain simplicity. Based on this analysis, generate a high-quality mechanism diagram that closely aligns with the manuscript content, profoundly reflecting the interactions between molecules (such as activation, inhibition, binding, etc.), but only retain the core key pathway information, ensuring the diagram is concise, aesthetically pleasing, and avoids overcrowding with too many elements. The diagram must be in bioRender style: clean, professional, vector graphics, using arrows, shapes, and color coding to represent relationships (e.g., green arrows for activation, red dashed lines for inhibition), including necessary cellular components, molecular icons, and pathway flows, but do not display any title. Final output should be only the generated image description or the directly generated image file. [Paste your paper manuscript content here]

48. Grok4根据论⽂手稿及审稿意见⼀键回复(调用Expert模型)，适合于1区以下杂志。

中文Prompt:

您是Grok 4 ，一位在高影响力Q1 SCI期刊科学手稿修改和审稿回复方面的专家。结合 快速手稿修改的最佳实践——如将意见分类为重大/次要/建议、优先处理、使用修订追踪 等工具，并确保礼貌、专业语气以提高接受率——我将提供完整的手稿内容和详细的审稿 人意见。您的任务是彻底分析两者，并针对每条审稿意见创建逐点回复。每条回复应：

以逐字重述审稿人的意见开头，以确保清晰。

精确描述在修改后的手稿中如何处理该意见，包括具体更改（如添加部分、图表、 数据或重述文本，并注明行号）。

从手稿、相关文献或逻辑推理中提供支持证据或理由。

全程保持礼貌、专业、简洁并表达感激的语气。

如果不同意意见，请尊重地解释原因，并提供强有力的理由和备选方案（如适用）。 将输出结构化为与每个意见对应的编号列表。包括开头的致谢段落和结尾的总结，强调改 进点。如果需要，建议任何额外整体修改以加速发表。确保回复高质量、全面，并符合提 高接受概率的策略（如全面处理关切，避免无关新内容）。

这是完整的手稿内容：[在此粘贴完整手稿]

这是审稿人意见：[在此粘贴完整审稿人意见]

English Prompt:

You are Grok 4, an expert in scientific manuscript revision and crafting responses to reviewers for high-impact Q1 SCI journals. Drawing from best practices in rapid manuscript revision—such as classifying comments into major/minor/suggestions, prioritizing fixes, using tools like tracked changes, and ensuring polite, professional tone to boost acceptance rates—I will provide the full manuscript content and detailed reviewer comments. Your task is to analyze both thoroughly and create a point-by-point response to each reviewer comment. For each response:

Begin by restating the reviewer’s comment verbatim for clarity.

Describe precisely how the comment was addressed in the revised manuscript, including specific changes (e.g., added sections, figures, data, or rephrased text with line numbers).

Provide supporting evidence or justification from the manuscript, relevant literature, or logical reasoning.

Maintain a polite, professional, concise, and grateful tone throughout.

If disagreeing with a comment, explain respectfully with robust rationale and suggest alternatives if applicable.

Structure the output as a numbered list matching each comment. Include an introductory thank-you paragraph and a concluding summary emphasizing improvements. Suggest any additional overall revisions if needed to accelerate publication. Ensure responses are high-quality, comprehensive, and aligned with strategies to increase acceptance probability (e.g., full addressing of concerns, no new unrelated content).

Here is the full manuscript content: [Paste the complete manuscript here]

Here are the reviewer comments: [Paste the full reviewer comments here]

49. GPT-5-Thining 模型根据论⽂手稿及审稿意见⼀键回复，适合于1区以上及顶刊

中文Prompt

【任务说明】

你是一个资深 SCI 审稿回复专家， 目标是根据我提供的手稿内容（Manuscript）与审 稿人意见（Reviewers’ comments），为每一位审稿人的每一条意见生成 可直接提交的逐 条回复（Response to Reviewers）草稿，语言为中文。最终产出要能最大化提高文章 被接收的概率，适合一区（Q1）期刊提交。

【我会提供】（请把以下内容原文粘贴到这里）

Manuscript（或关键段落/方法/图表/补充材料）。

Reviewer comments （按 Reviewer# 分组，保留原文，逐条编号）。

（可选）任何你希望模型优先采纳的额外说明或限制（如：不能做新实验；必须在 两周内提交等）。

【输出格式要求 — 必须严格遵守，便于直接复制粘贴】

对每位 Reviewer，按下列模板逐条输出（中文） ：

Reviewer #N — Comment M (原文引用)：

（逐字粘贴审稿意见第 M 条原文）

Response (中文，礼貌/简洁/事实导向，最多 200-300 字)：

（先一句感谢，再给出明确回答：已修改 / 已补做实验并简述结果 / 无法做实验及有 力替代 / 礼貌不同意并给出数据/文献依据）

具体修改建议（可直接粘回稿件的“替换句”或新增句）：

（给出 1–3 个可直接复制到稿件的方法或句子，用书面科研风格，<80 字）

修改位置（示例格式，若你不知道精确页码可用占位符） ：

Manuscript: p. X, lines Y–Z; Figure/Table: Fig. X / Table X; Supplementary: S1

如果审稿意见要求新实验且不可行：

（用不超过 6 行说明为何不可行 + 两个可接受替代方案：a) 用已有数据做的补充分析 （具体写法）；b) 在讨论中以何种措辞说明该限制并建议未来工作 - 并给出确切建议句）

若审稿意见互相冲突（A 、B 冲突）：

（给出折衷方案并写一段简短说明如何在稿件中体现）

必要时的文献/数据引用（最多 2 个关键参考或数据点， 用以支撑回复；若无请写 “见稿件新增讨论段”）：

Where changed: （同上， 按稿件清洁版实际位置填写占位提示）

【总体风格与语气要求】

语气诚恳、专业、客观、避免对抗。

用词保守（例如 use: “suggests/consistent with/may indicate” 而非绝对断言）。

对所有“已做”声明必须具体说明是在哪里修改或放置了哪些图/表/补充材料。

若需要英文润色/语言服务，请在回复中加入一句说明，例如：“稿件已由 XX 英文 润色服务润色（或由母语同行校对）”。

每条回复尽量不超过 300 字（主文本），但“具体修改建议”要简洁可复制。 【额外输出】（模型应同时生成）

A. 一段给 Editor 的简短 summary（中文，3–6 句）概述主要修改要点；

B. 一 个 “ 提 交 文 件 清 单 ” 建 议 （列 出 要 上 传 的 文 件 名 ， 例 如 ： Response_to_Reviewers.docx; Manuscript_tracked.docx; Manuscript_clean.docx; Fig1.svg; Supplementary_TableS1.xlsx）。

【限制与注意】

• 不要自行假设手稿结论以外的新实验结论， 所有数据陈述必须基于我提供的手稿或 我随后补充的数据。
• 若模型认为某条意见需要进一步澄清且无法在当前信息下给出充分回复，请直接给 出 两种可选回复方案（短期替代 vs 长期补实验）并标明优先级。

【输出示例（非常简短示范）】

Reviewer #1 — Comment 1:

“请补充XXX的计算方法并报告置信区间。”

Response: 感谢审稿人的建议。我们在 Methods （p.10, lines 120–128）增加了XXX的计 算公式，并在 Results 中补充了95%置信区间（见 Table 2）。具体修改句：“ … …（可直接 替换句）” 。 Where changed: Methods p.10 lines 120–128; Table 2.

现在：请等待我粘贴 Manuscript 与 Reviewer comments，然后按上面规则逐条生成回 复。

英文Promot:

【Task description】

You are a senior scientific peer-review response expert. Your job is to produce polished,

submission-ready Response-to-Reviewers entries in English, based strictly on the

Manuscript text and the Reviewers’ comments I will provide. Responses should maximize the chance of acceptance at a Q1 SCI journal.

【I will provide】 (paste below)

The Manuscript (clean version and/or excerpts: methods, results, figures, supplementary).

Reviewer comments (original wording), grouped by Reviewer and numbered.

Optional constraints (e.g., cannot run new experiments, two-week resubmission window). 【Strict output format — follow exactly】

For each Reviewer and each comment, produce the following sections:

Reviewer #N — Comment M (quote reviewer text): > (exact reviewer text)

Response (clear, polite, evidence-based, max 200–300 words):

(One opening sentence thanking the reviewer, then a concise statement: modified in manuscript / additional experiments done and result summary / cannot perform experiment + viable

alternatives / respectfully declined with justification referencing data or literature).

Exact manuscript edit(s) (copy-ready sentence(s) or paragraph to insert or replace; <= 80 words):

(Provide 1–3 exact sentences the author can paste into the manuscript.)

Where changed (precise location):

Manuscript: p. X, lines Y–Z; Figure/Table: Fig. X / Table X; Supplementary: S1

If the requested experiment is infeasible, state briefly (≤6 lines) why and give two practical alternatives:

a) Additional analyses using existing data — specify exactly what test/analysis and where results would appear.

b) Suggested wording to add to Discussion to acknowledge the limitation and propose future work (provide exact sentence).

If comments from different reviewers conflict, provide a balanced compromise and suggestedtext.

Key supporting citations/data (up to 2 items) or say “see added Discussion” if applicable. Where changed: (repeat location to be pasted into Response-to-Reviewers)

【Style & tone】

• Polite, non-defensive, objective.
• Use cautious language (e.g., “suggests”, “consistent with”, “may indicate”).
• Whenever you claim “we did X”, explicitly state where the change appears in the manuscript.
• Indicate if the manuscript has been professionally language-edited.
• Keep each Response under 300 words; keep ‘Exact manuscript edits’ short and directly copy- pasteable.

【Additional required outputs】

A. A short cover letter paragraph to the Editor summarizing the main revisions (3–6 sentences).

B. A recommended submission file checklist with filenames.

【Constraints】

• Do not invent data. Use only manuscript-provided data.
• If you cannot answer fully with provided materials, offer two alternative reply strategies (short- term textual fix; longer-term experimental plan).

【Minimal example (format):】 Reviewer #1 — Comment 1:

“Please provide the calculation for metric X and its 95% CI.”

Response: Thank you for this suggestion. We have added the formula for metric X to Methods (p.10, lines 120–128) and report 95% CIs in Table 2. Exact manuscript edit: “We calculated X as …; 95% CI was computed using …” . Where changed: Methods p.10 lines 120–128; Table 2.

Now I will paste the Manuscript text and the Reviewer comments. After that, generate the full set of Response-to-Reviewers entries following the format above.